CO129-164 - Sir Kennedy - 1873 [7-9] — Page 375

As

any

error committed

373

in that respect was

obrews also

Speedily rectified, and the huss to Jardine to not Best any complaint on this point I am aware that your action up to that time was not based on the fact that the cargo to be put

on board the

Cyprianes at Macao vas pufared opinne I regret however that

you should subsequently

allox applied to the H. J. Consul, and

Jan

have telegraphed to the Brutist Consul at Francisco respecting the opnine carried by

that steamer, and ot think that it would have

been better if the question of the operim had not been imported into the matter, which should have teen confined to the point

A Mache

Venty

the

My

Tove her with

on the Zemun Asper 100

this

Thether it is desirable that

Akc

beans

shife having Chinese tangle free luni pants should I allowed trall at Xffee the macus efter leaving It Kony.

For Holland

It may be inconvenient with refer to possible legal procedings to furnish messus J. M. & Co with this weapon against the local you?? ?Insert instead:–

4. You will inform muss). Du 16° that I regret that the action of the local goot in tile matter should have caused them any icon rauience" But that dice Woblanm the action taken

ku Karac

witthe cam & the Zemunder,

cure your prin

acked ytter Consel & in eply you

uply you drickaund

ay desin to interpont only refissed him to

andere on this puede amor. poi pundeamor.

I will verify them 10912/0ur Holland.

I sent on with the

returns to Dipl

[whether the res

Charterers neranda p

master of the "Cyphones"

had, on and not, Fioluted any provisions of the Chinese Passenger Ordmaning

with

Commmmiante

# 4 You

the Substance of this respetor to mess?s Jarding mather

Pardine

& Co in reply to their

letter.

5.

I would suggest, in

order to prevent the recurrence of Sunnlen proceedings in future, tut

for the first instance to the paper of particulars d? a Chinese Passenger Vissel has to furniste in order to obtain an exemption. under the orda 204 of 1870. Should contain a clause

le distinctly shewn

To this not practically

RM Trected by the revised paper.

it

of patientars, (last enclosure protindung showing that

m 7848?

R&

it is not intubed that She should call at reacur.

It appears

that

have